INTRODUCTION
Subheading: The Shift You Didn’t See Coming
Is the global automotive landscape shifting under our feet? The China auto industry influence has grown rapidly over the past two decades, quietly reshaping the global market. As Chinese investments and partnerships proliferate, the question arises: Who truly holds the keys to the world’s most iconic car brands?
Over the past two decades, China’s role in the global automotive industry has transformed dramatically. From being a manufacturing hub for Western automakers to becoming a significant stakeholder and partner, Chinese influence now permeates various facets of the automotive world.
Companies like Geely have acquired full ownership of renowned brands such as Volvo and majority stakes in Lotus, while holding significant shares in Mercedes-Benz and Aston Martin. State-owned enterprises like SAIC and Dongfeng have established joint ventures with General Motors, Volkswagen, and Stellantis, producing millions of vehicles annually.
Moreover, China’s dominance isn’t limited to brand ownership. The nation controls a substantial portion of the electric vehicle (EV) battery supply chain, with companies like CATL leading in battery technology and production. This control extends to critical raw materials essential for EV manufacturing, positioning China as an indispensable player in the industry’s future.
As we delve deeper into this topic, we’ll explore the extent of Chinese investments in Western car manufacturers, the implications of joint ventures, and the strategic moves that have allowed China to become a central figure in the global automotive narrative.
A Timeline of Takeovers: From Manufacturing Base to Boardroom Power
For much of the 20th century, the global automotive industry was dominated by Western powerhouses — American giants like General Motors and Ford, German engineering leaders like Volkswagen and Mercedes-Benz, and Japanese efficiency experts like Toyota and Honda. China, meanwhile, played a minimal role, limited largely to assembling cheap cars for its domestic market and acting as a low-cost manufacturing base for global brands.
But that began to change rapidly in the early 2000s. What started as a strategy to learn from foreign carmakers through joint ventures slowly evolved into a full-scale campaign of acquisitions, investments, and technological catch-up — and in many ways, leapfrogging. Today, China is no longer just assembling cars for others. It’s buying the companies, influencing their strategies, and defining the industry’s future.
2003–2010: Learning by Assembling
During this period, China aggressively encouraged joint ventures between state-owned companies and foreign automakers. Brands like General Motors, Volkswagen, Toyota, and Honda were granted access to the Chinese market, but only through 50-50 partnerships with Chinese firms like SAIC, FAW, and Dongfeng. This helped Chinese companies gain manufacturing expertise, process knowledge, and technology, often through mandated technology sharing.
2010–2017: The Buying Begins
The true turning point came in 2010, when Geely — a relatively unknown Chinese automaker at the time — shocked the world by purchasing Volvo Cars from Ford for $1.8 billion. Many in the industry predicted failure. Instead, Geely respected Volvo’s autonomy, pumped money into R&D, and helped revive the brand.
This success emboldened more moves:
- 2012: Dongfeng purchased a major stake in PSA Group (now Stellantis), gaining influence over French brands like Peugeot and Citroën.
- 2017: Geely acquired a majority stake in Lotus Cars, the British performance brand.
2018–2023: Strategic Stakes & Global Expansion
This period marked a turning point in the China auto industry influence, shifting from acquisitions to strategic investments and global brand expansion.
- Geely quietly purchased a 9.7% stake in Daimler AG (Mercedes-Benz) in 2018, making it the largest single shareholder at the time.
- BAIC, a Chinese state-owned firm, also built up a 9.98% stake in Daimler, gaining board-level access and influence.
- SAIC Motor expanded MG Motor globally, rebranding it as a modern, affordable EV-focused brand outside of China.
Simultaneously, Chinese EV companies began building reputations beyond their borders. BYD, NIO, and XPeng launched vehicles in Europe, while Polestar — owned by Geely via Volvo — emerged as a global EV contender.
2024–Present: A New Era of Ownership and Control
As of today, Chinese entities either own outright or hold major stakes in multiple Western car companies, including:
- Volvo Cars – 100% owned by Geely
- Lotus Cars – Majority owned by Geely
- MG – Fully owned by SAIC Motor
- Polestar – Controlled by Geely (via Volvo)
- Mercedes-Benz – Combined Chinese ownership (Geely + BAIC) nearing 20%
- Stellantis – Dongfeng holds a 12.2% stake
China has gone from partner to power broker. It now holds seats at the decision-making tables of Europe’s most prestigious carmakers, and in many cases, directs the future of legacy brands once considered untouchable.
Who Owns What? A Breakdown of China Auto Industry Influence in Western Car Companies
Behind many Western carmakers’ glossy logos and legacy reputations lies a growing web of Chinese ownership, partnerships, and strategic equity stakes. What was once a slow trickle of joint ventures has evolved into full ownership, boardroom influence, and financial leverage.
This section provides a detailed breakdown of the most significant examples of China auto industry influence through ownership stakes in Western automotive brands — a shift that’s redefining the balance of power in the global auto industry.
Volvo Cars (Sweden) is wholly owned by Geely, which acquired the brand from Ford in 2010. What many predicted would be a misstep turned into a success story, with Geely respecting Volvo’s identity while financing its revival. Volvo remains headquartered in Sweden but is now a symbol of Chinese automotive leadership on the global stage.
Lotus Cars (UK) is another classic European brand now under Geely’s majority ownership. Acquired in 2017, Lotus is transforming dramatically — from niche British sports car maker to an electric performance powerhouse with global ambitions, funded and directed by Chinese capital.
MG (UK, historic) is now entirely owned by SAIC Motor, one of China’s largest state-owned carmakers. The brand has no operational connection to its original British roots; all MG vehicles are now designed and manufactured in China, then marketed internationally as value-oriented EVs and hybrids.
Related reading: China bans Boeing aircraft deliveries — and what it means for the global market.
Polestar (Sweden) is a spin-off of Volvo and remains majority controlled by Geely. While it is publicly traded (under the ticker PSNY), both Geely and Volvo hold most shares, meaning Chinese influence still directs the brand’s strategy, R&D, and capital allocation.
Mercedes-Benz Group (Germany) has two Chinese powerhouses on its shareholder roster: Geely with 9.7% and BAIC Group with 9.98%. Together, these stakes total nearly 20% of one of Germany’s most iconic automakers. Both companies have board-level access and active strategic collaborations with Mercedes, particularly in EV development and mobility innovation.
Stellantis (France/Italy/US), the parent company of Peugeot, Citroën, Fiat, Chrysler, Jeep, and more, includes Chinese state-owned Dongfeng Motor as a significant shareholder. Dongfeng owns about 12.2% of the group and has long been a key joint venture partner in China, producing multiple Stellantis brands locally.
Smart (Germany), formerly a wholly-owned Mercedes brand, is now a 50/50 joint venture between Mercedes-Benz and Geely. With manufacturing moved to China and design handled collaboratively, Smart is being relaunched as a modern, electric-only brand targeting global urban markets, with Geely leading production and platform development.
This isn’t just about ownership but direction, strategy, and influence. Through acquisitions, equity stakes, and joint ventures, Chinese companies now help define product pipelines, technology adoption, and market rollouts for some of the most iconic car brands in the Western world.
Beyond the Badges: How Joint Ventures Extend China’s Reach
Even without outright ownership, Chinese influence over Western carmakers is deeply entrenched through joint ventures — long-term partnerships that embed Chinese companies inside global automotive giants’ operations, manufacturing pipelines, and strategy decisions. These partnerships, often legally required to access China’s lucrative market, have for years enabled technology transfer, local production, and deep interdependence between Western brands and their Chinese counterparts.
While these joint ventures were once seen as a price of entry, they’ve since evolved into powerful tools for Chinese firms to gain expertise, production control, and a seat at the global table, without needing to purchase a controlling stake.
A Legally Engineered Arrangement
For decades, foreign automakers were required by Chinese law to form 50/50 joint ventures with local firms to manufacture and sell cars in China. These rules applied to every major player, from General Motors and Volkswagen to Toyota and BMW. While Tesla was the first to bypass this rule in 2019, most others remain locked into joint production structures that serve as pipelines for both revenue and influence.
Key Joint Ventures That Matter
Volkswagen Group, one of the largest automakers in the world, operates through SAIC Volkswagen and FAW-Volkswagen in China. These two partnerships manufacture everything from budget sedans to luxury Audis. VW sells more vehicles in China than any other region, making it highly dependent on its Chinese partners for revenue and scale.
General Motors, via its partnership with SAIC Motor, co-owns SAIC-GM, which produces and sells Chevrolet, Buick, and Cadillac models throughout China. The joint venture is responsible for millions of vehicles annually. There’s also SAIC-GM-Wuling, a three-way JV that created China’s best-selling budget EV: the Wuling Hongguang Mini EV.
BMW has partnered with Brilliance Auto Group for local production in China. Although BMW has since increased its stake to gain majority control (a rare move in China), Brilliance remains an essential part of BMW’s localized operations and success in the Chinese market.
Toyota and Honda rely on joint ventures with GAC Group and FAW, producing a wide range of vehicles tailored specifically for Chinese consumers. These partnerships are also now expanding into EV development and hydrogen technologies, further deepening the China auto industry influence across future mobility platforms.
Stellantis, through Dongfeng Motor Corporation, operates multiple joint ventures that manufacture Peugeot, Citroën, and Jeep vehicles in China. Despite recent declines in market share, Dongfeng’s stake in Stellantis ensures continued leverage.
Even Mercedes-Benz, despite not being required by law, engages in joint EV development with BAIC Motor, helping to accelerate the rollout of electric Mercedes models in China and abroad.
From Assembly to Strategy
What makes these joint ventures more than simple business arrangements is how they’ve evolved. In many cases, Chinese partners now co-develop platforms, engines, and software, giving them not just operational visibility but influence over design, engineering, and future technology directions. Western carmakers benefit from localized expertise, while Chinese firms gain long-term knowledge and IP exposure that would have been unthinkable under a more traditional supplier-client model.
In many cases, Chinese firms have often used joint ventures as launchpads for their brands. SAIC used its experience with GM and VW to build up Roewe and MG. While more independent, Geely has employed joint development partnerships to accelerate technology integration across its holdings.
Global Dependencies and the Quiet Trade-Off
The trade-off is clear: access to China’s consumer base and production ecosystem in exchange for long-term entanglement with Chinese firms that, in many cases, now compete globally with the very brands they once supported.
This raises a key question for Western carmakers: At what point does partnership become dependency? And how long can companies maintain strategic independence when vital parts of their operations — from engineering to supply chains — are deeply tied to China’s industrial complex?
EV Power Play: China’s Dominance in the Electric Future
The Silent Engine Behind the EV Boom
While traditional car manufacturing gave China a seat at the table, the global shift to electric vehicles (EVs) has positioned the country at the head of it. Through early government backing, relentless industrial scaling, and strategic control of the EV supply chain, China now dominates nearly every stage of electric vehicle production — from raw materials to battery technology to finished vehicles.
This isn’t just a story of low-cost manufacturing. It’s about how the China auto industry influence engineered a global lead in the most transformative technology shift the auto industry has seen in over a century.
China’s Battery Supremacy
At the heart of every electric car is a battery, and China controls the global battery game. Chinese firms produce over 70% of the world’s EV batteries, with CATL (Contemporary Amperex Technology Co. Limited) and BYD leading the charge. CATL alone supplies batteries to Tesla, BMW, Hyundai, Honda, and more, effectively making it a backbone of the global EV industry.
This dominance didn’t happen by accident. The Chinese government subsidized battery production, gave land and energy incentives to battery manufacturers, and restricted foreign control in sensitive sectors to provide its domestic players a head start. As Western carmakers ramped up EV ambitions, many had no choice but to rely on Chinese battery makers.
Raw Materials, Strategic Control
EV batteries require critical minerals: lithium, cobalt, nickel, and graphite. China doesn’t control all of the global reserves, but it dominates processing and refining, which is arguably more important.
- 70–80% of the world’s lithium refining happens in China.
- Nearly all of the world’s natural graphite anodes used in batteries are processed in China.
- Through global deals, China has secured access to mines in Africa, South America, and Australia, ensuring long-term supply.
In other words, even if a Western company sources raw materials from outside China, it often still relies on Chinese refineries and processors to make those materials usable.
EV Brands Born in China — and Going Global
While legacy carmakers are pivoting toward electrification, Chinese automakers are already there and now moving outward.
- BYD, backed by Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway, is now one of the world’s largest EV manufacturers. It outsold Tesla in global plug-in vehicle sales in 2023.
- NIO, XPeng, and Leapmotor are pushing aggressively into European markets with sleek, tech-driven EVs.
- Geely has launched global electric brands including Polestar and Zeekr, with ambitions to compete directly with Tesla and legacy Western brands in both premium and mainstream segments.
These companies aren’t just exporting cars, they’re building factories and R&D centers abroad, backed by vast Chinese state financing and vertically integrated supply chains.
Charging Infrastructure and Smart Tech
China has also scaled charging infrastructure faster than any country worldwide, installing more than 1.8 million public EV chargers by 2024 — roughly two-thirds of the global total. Domestically, that infrastructure has helped normalize EV ownership. Internationally, it sets a benchmark other countries struggle to match.
Moreover, Chinese EV makers lead in connected car technology and software-defined vehicles, with advanced infotainment systems, over-the-air updates, and AI-powered driver-assist features often beating their Western counterparts in affordability and innovation.
Dependence and Leverage
Whether they admit it or not, Western automakers depend on China’s EV ecosystem — not just for batteries, but for expertise, components, and cost-effective production. Even Tesla, with its massive Shanghai Gigafactory, produces more vehicles in China than anywhere else and uses Chinese suppliers for much of its supply chain.
As global markets push toward electric mandates, the question becomes: Can the West catch up without China? Or will it be forced to compete on China’s terms?
For now, the momentum is clearly in Beijing’s favour.
The Strategic Logic: Why China Is Buying the Auto Industry
Not Just Business — A National Playbook for Global Power
China’s growing control of the global automotive landscape isn’t just about making profits or expanding market share. It’s part of a broader, long-term national strategy — one that combines industrial policy, global influence, and technological self-sufficiency.
We need to look beyond quarterly earnings to understand why Chinese companies have invested so heavily in Western car brands and supply chains. This is a state-aligned industrial mission, and it fits squarely within China’s geopolitical and economic ambitions.
Made in China 2025 — and the Auto Industry’s Role
Launched in 2015, the Made in China 2025 initiative is a government-backed blueprint to move the country up the value chain in key industries — including aerospace, semiconductors, AI, and new-energy vehicles. The goal: transform China from the world’s factory into a global technology and innovation leader.
The auto industry, especially EVs and autonomous vehicles, is one of its top priorities. Why? Because it represents:
- The future of mobility and logistics
- A major driver of industrial employment
- A platform for data collection and AI deployment
- A source of global economic leverage
Controlling this industry — domestically and internationally — helps China cement its role as an innovation power, not just a production hub.
Tech Transfer Without Waiting
Owning or investing in Western carmakers is a strategic extension of China auto industry influence, and not just about accessing consumers — it’s about absorbing advanced automotive knowledge quickly. By purchasing Volvo, for example, Geely gained:
- World-class safety engineering
- Global emissions compliance know-how
- Premium design and brand equity
Instead of spending decades developing that expertise organically, Chinese companies gained it instantly — and then used it to upgrade their domestic offerings.
The same goes for Daimler (Mercedes-Benz), Lotus, and even Stellantis: access to intellectual property, supply networks, and premium-market credibility has allowed Chinese firms to leapfrog developmental stages and shorten their path to global relevance.
Global Brand Influence at a Discount
Many of these acquisitions happened during vulnerable times:
- Volvo was sold post-financial crisis, when Ford was restructuring.
- Lotus, Aston Martin, and others were struggling financially.
- Stellantis’s complex merger opened the door for deeper Chinese equity involvement.
For Chinese companies, this was strategic timing. They didn’t just want factories — they wanted brands with history, trust, and Western identity. It’s much easier to win hearts and wallets abroad when the badge says “Volvo” or “MG” than if it carries an unfamiliar Chinese name.
Access to Global Markets and Regulation
Buying or partnering with Western automakers also gives Chinese firms a fast track into markets that are difficult to enter due to emissions rules, safety regulations, or consumer bias.
For example:
- Polestar (Geely/Volvo) was designed for the European and North American markets, leveraging Volvo’s reputation and certification infrastructure.
- MG under SAIC now sells in over 80 countries, despite being fully made in China.
By piggybacking on Western regulatory footprints and sales networks, Chinese automakers expand faster, with lower resistance and higher brand trust.
Influence Without Ownership: Strategic Positioning
Even in cases where full acquisitions weren’t possible (or politically palatable), minority stakes and joint ventures offer a subtler, but equally effective form of influence. With ~20% combined ownership of Mercedes-Benz, for example, Geely and BAIC have board access, tech partnerships, and real input on direction, without full exposure or headline scrutiny.
This reflects the broader Chinese industrial playbook: position yourself in the value chain, wherever influence is possible, and deepen that role over time.
Can the West Catch Up — Or Even Pull Back?
A Race Against Time — And Strategic Entanglement
As Chinese companies tighten their grip on the global automotive supply chain, the obvious question becomes: Can the West catch up? Or, perhaps more realistically: Is it even possible to decouple at this point?
The answer isn’t simple. It depends on what catching up means, how deeply entangled Western automakers are with Chinese firms, and whether political will matches industrial reality.
Western Response: Scrambling for Supply Chain Sovereignty
In recent years, Western governments have finally woken up to the risks of over-reliance on China, not just in tech or pharmaceuticals, but also in the automotive sector.
- The U.S. Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) offers generous tax credits and subsidies to encourage domestic EV production and reduce dependence on Chinese battery materials. To qualify, vehicles must use American or allied-country-sourced materials — a move explicitly designed to freeze out Chinese components.
- The European Union has launched its own battery alliance and green industrial plan, aiming to localize battery production and secure raw materials through new trade partnerships.
- Canada, Australia, and others are also ramping up mining and refining critical minerals to counter China’s near-monopoly on EV battery inputs like lithium, cobalt, and graphite.
These efforts are significant, but they are also playing catch-up to a system China has been building for over a decade.
Tesla, VW, and the Realities of “Made in China”
While governments talk of decoupling, many automakers remain deeply embedded in China’s industrial ecosystem:
- Tesla’s Gigafactory Shanghai is the company’s largest production site. Tesla relies on Chinese suppliers for everything from batteries to chips. Elon Musk has repeatedly praised China’s efficiency, even as U.S. policy shifts toward protectionism.
- Volkswagen sells more cars in China than in other regions and relies heavily on its SAIC and FAW joint ventures. VW is also developing new EV platforms with Chinese partners to stay competitive in the local market.
- BMW, Mercedes-Benz, GM, and others depend on joint ventures, Chinese battery suppliers, or both. Pulling out would mean financial losses and losing access to the world’s largest car market.
The contradiction is clear: while governments push for independence, Western companies are still choosing entanglement — further locking in China auto industry influence for short-term competitiveness.
The Risk of Strategic Leverage
This raises an uncomfortable question: What happens if geopolitical tensions escalate further? Could China use its dominance in EV batteries or critical minerals as leverage, the way Russia used natural gas?
The answer is yes — at least in theory. China has already restricted exports of rare earth elements in past trade disputes. If similar tactics were used in the automotive sector, it could disrupt production across Europe and North America almost overnight.
This isn’t science fiction — it’s a real vulnerability. And it’s not just about batteries. Software-defined vehicles, AI driving systems, and EV infrastructure are also areas where Chinese firms are gaining ground. The West risks being outpaced not just industrially, but technologically.
Is Reversal Even Possible?
Pulling back isn’t just hard — it’s costly and politically complicated. Localizing EV supply chains, rebuilding battery factories, securing new mineral sources — all of this takes years, and requires consistent government policy, billions in investment, and cooperation across borders.
Moreover, many consumers have embraced Chinese-affiliated brands like Polestar, MG, or even Volvo without realizing the shift in ownership or control. Public opinion doesn’t always align with political strategy, making decisive action harder to sustain.
Western automakers face a stark choice: accelerate independence, or risk irrelevance. But either path comes with risk, cost, and hard trade-offs.
Conclusion: Who’s Really in the Driver’s Seat?
Ownership, Dependence, and the Future of Western Mobility
What began as a business story has become a geopolitical one. In just two decades, China has gone from being a low-cost manufacturing partner to a central force in the global automotive industry — not through conquest, but through capital, policy, and patience.
Today, Chinese firms own or control major stakes in legendary Western brands. They dominate the battery supply chain, lead in EV innovation, and increasingly shape the software and digital architecture that defines the modern car. Even companies still “Western” in name rely heavily on Chinese inputs to survive and compete in the electric future.
This reality is a stark reminder of how deeply the China auto industry influence has reshaped global capitalism. Where once the West viewed China as a factory for its goods, the relationship has flipped — now it’s China that shapes the technologies, partnerships, and even boardroom decisions of Western mobility giants.
The most striking part? Much of the public barely notices. Consumers continue to buy Volvos, drive Polestars, and plug in their Teslas, unaware that the underlying systems — from the batteries to the corporate ownership — are inextricably linked to Beijing’s industrial ecosystem.
So, where does this leave Western governments and automakers?
Caught between the urgency to compete, the fear of dependence, and the cost of pulling back, they now face hard, long-term questions:
- Can the West regain control over its automotive future — or has too much been ceded already?
- Is collaboration with China still viable in a world of rising geopolitical friction?
- Will the next generation of innovation be shaped in Detroit, Stuttgart, and Tokyo — or Hangzhou, Shanghai, and Shenzhen?
One thing is clear: the steering wheel isn’t where it used to be.
What do you think? Is the West still in control, or just along for the ride?
Share your perspective in the comments below or join the ongoing conversation on the Fliegerfaust Facebook page. Don’t forget to follow us on Twitter/X for more updates and insights.
For full details, please refer to our Disclaimer page.